Dear Friend of Palestinians and Israelis, 
  
    I'm ramping up for take-off this Wednesday at HASP.  Sixty-three (63) persons (college and university professionals from the Holland, MI area) are enrolled in the class on Kairos USA (an American Christian response to Palestinian Christians' call for help) 
  
    It is not hard to see why Kairos USA, and the Isr/Pal Mission Network (I/PMN - PCUSA) are excited by the actions of the 15 heads of (mainline) denominations to call US military assistance to Israel to account.  I applaud their efforts as well, and desire many to join them in writing our congress men and women, to change the culture in Washington, D.C.  I'd like to think that US lock-step support of any and everything Israel wishes to do in the occupied territories will end.  Criticism of Israel will have to be permitted.  The automatic accusation that it is "Anti-Semitic" will not hold up any longer. 
  
    KUSA seeks to mobilize ecumenical and evangelical Christians to take decisive actions to End the Occupation of Palestinian land, and the abuses attendant to that Occupation. 
  
    Below, is an assessment by Rami Kouri, held in high regard by long-time observers and activists in Isr/Pal, an editor of the Daily Star in Beirut, Lebanon. 
Ethical Activism  Amid Politics as Usual 
by Rami G.  Khouri 
BOSTON  -- Two very different ways for the United States to deal with Arabs and Israelis  were on show last week in the United States. The contrast was stunning between  the televised debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney in which “I Love  Israel more than You Love Israel” was the background theme song that permeated  most discussions of issues, and a letter to Congress by 15 American religious  leaders asking for aid to Israel to be assessed according to law-based human  rights standards that Washington applies around the world. 
The  tilt towards Israeli views at the top of American politics is nothing new, and  therefore is not surprising or even meaningful; it is the way politics works in  Washington, where Israel usually can expect 90 percent or more of Congress to  blindly support it, regardless of the morality, legality or consequences of  Israel’s actions. The letter by the 15 church leaders is new, however, and  therefore significant, because it reflects a growing recent trend to demand that  the American government, churches and others treat Israel like they treat other  nations, rather than allow Israel to live by a separate set of rules. 
The  15 religious leaders represent many major faith groups in the U.S., including  Presbyterians, Evangelical Lutherans, United Methodists, the National Council of  Churches, the American Friends Service Committee, the Mennonite Central  Committee, the Orthodox Peace Fellowship, American Baptist Churches, United  Church of Christ, and others. 
They  stress their evenhanded commitment “to support both Israelis and Palestinians in  their desire to live in peace and well-being,” and state that, 
“[I]t  is our moral responsibility to question the continuation of unconditional U.S.  financial assistance to the government of Israel. Realizing a just and lasting  peace will require this accountability, as continued U.S. military assistance to  Israel -- offered without conditions or accountability -- will only serve to  sustain the status quo and Israel’s military occupation of the Palestinian  territories. We request, therefore, that Congress hold Israel accountable to  these standards by making the disbursement of U.S. military assistance to Israel  contingent on the Israeli government’s compliance with applicable U.S. laws and  policies…” particularly in the realm of human rights issues and the use of  American-supplied weapons. 
Holding  Israelis and Palestinians alike responsible for the prolonged violence in the  region, the church leaders state that “unconditional U.S. military assistance to  Israel has contributed to deteriorating conditions in Israel and the occupied  Palestinian territories which threaten to lead the region further away from the  realization of a just peace. Furthermore, such aid sustains the conflict and  undermines the long-term security interests of both Israelis and  Palestinians.” 
They  ask for an immediate investigation into possible violations by Israel of the  U.S. Foreign Assistance Act and the U.S. Arms Export Control Act, which prohibit  assistance to any country which engages in a consistent pattern of human rights  violations and limit the use of U.S. weapons to “internal security” or  “legitimate self-defense.” 
They  urge Congress to hold hearings to examine Israel’s compliance, and request  regular reporting on compliance and the withholding of military aid for  non-compliance. They base this call in part on the 2011  U.S. State Department Country Report on Human Rights Practices which  details widespread Israeli human rights violations committed against Palestinian  civilians, many of which involve the misuse of U.S.-supplied weapons (including  separate and unequal legal systems for Palestinians and settlers, confiscation  of Palestinian land and natural resources for the benefit of settlers, and  violence by settlers against Palestinians). 
The  letter and the position of the churches it reflects are significant for several  reasons. The most important is that this approach brings together American  values, laws and foreign policy positions in a manner that the U.S. government  itself often fails to do. Its call for a review of foreign aid policies on the  basis of American legal requirements is a position that most Americans would  support. It also clearly affirms that Israelis and Palestinians alike should  have the same rights to peace, security and well-being, pre-empting the usual  Israeli outcry that such demands for legal compliance by Israel are acts of  reflexive anti-Semitism or some other twisted view. 
These  three elements demand that American foreign policy reflect American legal and  ethical principles. They are also driven by concerns at the grassroots by  ordinary American men and women who dislike how the pro-Israeli tilt in  Washington has disfigured the integrity of faith-based values and legal dictates  in the United States. This combination of ethics, law and activism, which are  anchored in mainstream America, causes real problems for the pro-Israel lobbies  and associated political thugs in Washington whose intimidating impact centers  on politicians in the capital who often value incumbency over legality or  morality. That is how politicians behave. But now, in response to the excesses  of that process, we have a refreshing example of how faith leaders behave to  redress the ethical imbalances that define American foreign policy in the Middle  East. 
Rami  G. Khouri is Editor-at-large of The  Daily Star ,  and Director of the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International  Affairs at the American University of Beirut, in Beirut, Lebanon. You can follow  him @ramikhouri. 
Copyright  © 2012 Rami G. Khouri -- distributed by Agence Global 
No comments:
Post a Comment